Mazda cx 3 size comparison




Mazda cx 3 size comparison

Article Navigation:
  • Photo
  • Mazda 3 vs Mazda CX3 - Which is Better?
  • Video
  • RELATED PAGES
  • The width measurement of millimeters corresponds to the width of the Mazda CX-3 without exterior mirrors. Because of its size, features, ground clearance of 15 cm and length of mm, we classify the Mazda CX-3 in the category of compact SUV. Comparison of new cars with.

    Dimensions of new Mazda cars with pictures to compare the measurements of length, width and height of each Mazda CX-3 measures in mm See interior.

    Compare the Mazda CX-3's specs and features side by side with other vehicles using Mazda's comparison tool.

    Mazda cx 3 size comparison

    Mazda cx 3 size comparison

    Interior Le HR-V offers more luggage space in the trunk when the rear seat is up than the CX-3, and conserves this advantage even when the seat is folded down. However, Honda is giving the HR-V a manual transmission as standard equipment, and it must be said this choice does help the SUV provide its owners with a more positive driving experience. You may also consult other categories. On the other hand, the HR-V exhibited a braking distance that was shorter by some cm. The conventional buttons present in the Mazda are significantly more practical.

    Mazda cx 3 size comparison

    Mazda cx 3 size comparison

    Mazda cx 3 size comparison

    Mazda cx 3 size comparison

    Mazda cx 3 size comparison

    Compare the Mazda CX-3, CX-5, and CX-9 SUVs?

    Subcompact SUVs are continuing to grow in credibility and popularity. Initially greeted with much skepticism, they have become so popular that several carmakers have recently introduced new additions to the category in hopes of getting their piece of its increasingly lucrative pie. The segment now includes 10 models available in our market, two of which we chose for this head-to-head comparison: In terms of dimensions, the Honda clocks in at 4, mm in overall length, while the Mazda measures 4, mm — for a difference of 10 mm, less than the width of the average chocolate bar.

    On the other hand, with a total trunk cargo space of litres, the HR-V proves itself a superior utility vehicle than the Mazda, which only offers a middling litres. Drive train Given their dimensions and considering the category they slot into, you should not hold your breath expecting to find any kind of large-cylinder engine under the hood of either of these two vehicles.

    Mazda cx 3 size comparison

    The HR-V is powered by a 1. For the purposes of our comparative testing, the version we drove was equipped with a CVT transmission. However, Honda is giving the HR-V a manual transmission as standard equipment, and it must be said this choice does help the SUV provide its owners with a more positive driving experience.

    In our comparison, though, both of these versions are eclipsed by the 2. It can produce up to HP and lb-ft of torque, and is only available with a 6-speed automatic transmission. Better overall performance, reduced noise level and slightly quicker engine start and acceleration are the principal factors giving it the edge.

    Mazda cx 3 size comparison

    The all-wheel drive of both vehicles is of the all-conditions variety. Winter-time testing carried out of both models allowed us to determine that the Mazda system is more effective. Interior Le HR-V offers more luggage space in the trunk when the rear seat is up than the CX-3, and conserves this advantage even when the seat is folded down.

    The HR-V is also more generous in providing storage spaces. Turn your attention to the dashboard, however, and the CX-3 comes out the clear winner.

    This applies as much to questions of aesthetics as of practicality. In general the commands are good-sized buttons that are easy to handle. As is de rigueur these days, the display screen is slightly embossed. Long-term road-testing of Mazda vehicles fitted with this feature has proven its usefulness. For its part, the HR-V comes with the Lane Watch system, which displays on the screen a view of the right side of the vehicle when the turn signal is activated — a benefit that is worth noting.

    Mazda cx 3 size comparison

    Less stellar are several of the tactile commands that may darken the mood of however has to use them. The conventional buttons present in the Mazda are significantly more practical. That said, their performance on the road is more than adequate, the driving experience they offer growing more pleasant as the road gets curvier. The CX-3 comes out ahead in terms of its steering, which is more precise, and the way it handles the road is more gratifying for the driver.

    These pluses are even more pronounced when the Sport mode is activated. On the other hand, the HR-V exhibited a braking distance that was shorter by some cm. Lastly, fuel consumption is practically identical in each vehicle, any variation more likely to result from the driver than the cars themselves.

    2018 Hyundai Kona vs 2017 Mazda CX-3 (technical comparison)



    • Подписаться по RSSRSS
    • Поделиться VkontakteVkontakte
    • Поделиться на FacebookFacebook
    • Твитнуть!Twitter

    Leave a Reply

    Return to Top ▲TOP ▲